← Servers
Head to head

FreqBlog Music Metadata vs Figma Context

Figma Context leads on overall quality (91 vs 78 of 100).

Quality grade
B
A
Maintenancerelease cadence and recent activity
45 / 45
45 / 45
Completenessdescription, install path, license, source
22 / 35
35 / 35
Reliabilityworks-rate from real reviews
11 / 20
11 / 20
Tools exposed
12
local-only (not inspectable)
GitHub stars
0
15,538
Weekly installs
Works rate
no reviews yet
no reviews yet
Last activity
2026-07-14T15:25:21.374Z
2026-07-03T14:24:36.000Z
License
none stated
MIT
Trust
Publisher
Verified
Runs as
hosted (remote)
local

Tools, side by side

Only FreqBlog Music Metadata (12)
get_audio_featuresget_audio_features_batchsearch_catalogfind_tracks_by_bpmfind_tracks_by_keyfind_compatible_keysscore_transitionsuggest_next_trackbuild_setlistget_recommendationsget_related_artiststag_track
Only Figma Context (0)

No live tool schema yet.

Open FreqBlog Music MetadataOpen Figma Context
FreqBlog Music Metadata vs Figma Context: MCP server comparison · SocketCat