← Servers
Head to head

Codebase Memory vs Sichta Web

Codebase Memory leads on overall quality (91 vs 78 of 100).

Quality grade
A
B
Maintenancerelease cadence and recent activity
45 / 45
45 / 45
Completenessdescription, install path, license, source
35 / 35
22 / 35
Reliabilityworks-rate from real reviews
11 / 20
11 / 20
Tools exposed
local-only (not inspectable)
1
GitHub stars
39,826
0
Weekly installs
Works rate
no reviews yet
no reviews yet
Last activity
2026-08-22T05:57:22.000Z
2026-08-22T14:39:09.975Z
License
MIT
none stated
Trust
Verified
Publisher
Runs as
local
hosted (remote)

Tools, side by side

Only Codebase Memory (0)

No live tool schema yet.

Only Sichta Web (1)
scan_site
Open Codebase MemoryOpen Sichta Web
Codebase Memory vs Sichta Web: MCP server comparison · SocketCat