Provenancewhere it came from, and what was verified
Published to the official MCP registry by github.com/thyn-ai, which proved it owns this namespace.
🛡 Permissions & trustwhat this server can touch before you run it
About
Governed data discovery, exact queries, decisions, simulations, and runtime utilities over MCP.
Packages & transports
Computed from the server's own data, not a hidden formula. This measures how much you can depend on it, not how popular it is. Stars are shown separately, on purpose. How it's scored →
▸onboard_dataset100A
▸list_datasets93A
▸get_dataset_status100A
▸retrain_dataset75B
▸connect_data99A
▸list_data93A
▸get_data_summary100A
▸get_data_schema100A
▸refresh_data100A
▸disconnect_data90A
▸register_source100A
▸list_sources93A
▸get_source_schema100A
▸list_connectors68C
▸create_connector75B
▸get_connector65C
▸update_connector75B
▸test_connector75B
▸browse_connector75B
▸preview_test_connector75B
▸preview_browse_connector75B
▸delete_connector65C
▸get_repository_intelligence_capabilities100A
▸create_repository_snapshot75B
▸get_repository_snapshot75B
▸triage_repository75B
▸create_repository_decision_plan75B
▸query_repository_graph75B
▸simulate_repository75B
▸run_repository_pipeline75B
▸simulate_repository_patch75B
▸run_repository_fix75B
▸apply_repository75B
▸query_data94A
▸query_batch88A
▸query_sql_report100A
▸ingest_data100A
▸list_models100A
▸resolve_artifact_bridge75B
▸tokenize75B
▸count_tokens75B
▸chat_completions75B
▸responses75B
▸embeddings75B
▸embedding_similarity75B
▸rerank75B
▸list_runtime_libraries93A
▸execute_runtime_library94A
▸list_capability_providers100A
▸list_capability_bindings58C
▸create_capability_binding65C
▸test_capability_binding68C
▸discover_capability_binding68C
▸list_capabilities68C
▸get_capability65C
▸route_capabilities75B
▸execute_capability75B
▸list_skills75B
▸enable_skill75B
▸disable_skill65C
▸plan_decision100A
▸product_decision79B
▸product_agent_run75B
▸product_optimize75B
▸product_retrieve75B
▸product_forecast75B
▸simulate100A
▸recommend88A
▸score100A
▸batch100A
▸compare83B
▸submit_job81B
▸list_jobs77B
▸get_job_status90A
▸poll_job100A
▸get_job_result100A
▸cancel_job90A
▸test_webhook_delivery100A
▸create_agent_run65C
▸list_agent_runs75B
▸get_agent_run65C
▸get_agent_run_events75B
▸get_agent_run_checkpoints65C
▸query_agent_run_checkpoints65C
▸get_agent_run_mission_events75B
▸query_agent_run_mission_events75B
▸get_agent_run_telemetry65C
▸query_agent_run_telemetry75B
▸resume_agent_run65C
▸cancel_agent_run65C
▸approve_agent_run65C
▸list_deployment_regions100A
▸get_deployment100A
▸create_deployment68C
▸get_deployment_cost65C
▸delete_deployment65C
▸list_team_members58C
▸invite_team_member65C
▸update_team_member_role75B
▸remove_team_member75B
▸list_devices58C
▸revoke_device75B
▸get_audit_logs58C
▸get_audit_log_artifacts68C
▸get_execution_policy100A
▸list_execution_policy_snapshots100A
▸get_billing_info100A
▸create_billing_checkout68C
▸create_billing_portal100A
▸refresh_credits75B
▸ingest_metering_events75B
▸update_execution_policy68C
▸get_contract100A
▸get_runtime_manifest100A
▸get_runtime_release_validation100A
▸get_runtime_modules100A
▸get_runtime_benchmarks100A
▸get_me100A
▸update_me68C
▸get_limits75B
▸list_distributions75B
▸list_templates75B
▸list_api_keys100A
▸create_api_key65C
▸revoke_api_key65C
▸list_runs75B
▸get_run90A
▸get_analytics93A
▸get_usage75B
▸log_decision100A
▸list_decisions93A
▸get_decision90A
▸record_outcome100A
▸execute_decision100A
▸delete_decision90A
▸register_trigger100A
▸list_triggers93A
▸fire_trigger100A
▸pause_trigger90A
▸delete_trigger100A
Structural, not an LLM's opinion: each check is a fact about the tool's schema, so it's reproducible. One weak tool drags the score (60% average, 40% worst). How it's scored →
Raise this grade
up to +16 on qualityOwn this server? Here's exactly what to change, biggest wins first. Every number below is a fixed point value, so you can see what each edit is worth before you make it.
With no reviews this sits at a neutral 11. Reviews reporting it works push it toward the full 20.
Add an SPDX license (like MIT or Apache-2.0) to the repo so it's detected.
- Description is short (54 chars). Expand past 60 for full credit.
- 2 of 2 params have no description: `scope`, `provider_id`. Describe each one.
- No `required` array. Declare which params are mandatory so an agent knows what it must provide.
- Description is short (47 chars). Expand past 60 for full credit.
- 2 of 2 params have no description: `page`, `limit`. Describe each one.
- No `required` array. Declare which params are mandatory so an agent knows what it must provide.
- Description is short (53 chars). Expand past 60 for full credit.
- 2 of 2 params have no description: `page`, `limit`. Describe each one.
- No `required` array. Declare which params are mandatory so an agent knows what it must provide.
- Description is short (54 chars). Expand past 60 for full credit.
- 10 of 10 params have no description: `page`, `limit`, `action`, `result`, +6 more. Describe each one.
- No `required` array. Declare which params are mandatory so an agent knows what it must provide.
Already earned (4) ▾Already earned (4) ▴
These are structural checks, so the fixes are exact. See the full formula →
Add a badge to your README
[](https://socketcat.com/servers/io.github.thyn-ai/algenta)Shows your live quality grade and links back here. It updates itself as the grade changes.
Reviews
Sign in to leave a reviewNo reviews yet. Be the first to say whether it worked.
{
"mcpServers": {
"algenta": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"algenta-mcp"
]
}
}
}▶ Try itlive against api.algenta.ai
This server has a hosted endpoint, so we can connect and list its actual tools right here. Nothing runs on your machine.