Tool search 103,811 tools · 5,319 live servers

Full honeypot profile for an ASN (autonomous system / hosting provider). Use for: 'tell me about AS202425', 'what is Vultr doing in my honeypots?', 'attacks from this hosting provider', 'attribute this IP to its network'. asn format: 'AS12345'. Returns: total events, unique IPs, top targeted ports, top source countries, top user agents, org name. since/until are ISO-8601 UTC strings.

Return a structured attack methodology playbook for the given attack vector and optional target context, for use in authorized penetration testing, CTF, or security research. Covers reconnaissance, enumeration, exploitation, and post-exploitation phases for the vector, filtered to what is relevant given the provided stack and WAF profile. Each phase includes: what to look for, tools to use, common mistakes, detection indicators that would alert defenders, and recommended mitigations. Next-tool suggestions are pre-filled with payload generator and technique lookup calls. Covers 15 vectors via the vector enum. Authorized testing only.

Given a profile of the authorized test target (technology stack, exposed services, authentication type, OS), return a ranked list of ATT&CK techniques and OWASP test cases most relevant to that profile — not a generic dump of all techniques. Ranking factors: platform match, service match, auth type exposure, technique prevalence. Each result includes why it is relevant to this specific profile, the detection opportunity, and the recommended mitigation. Use when starting an authorized engagement to prioritize the testing scope; pair with pentest_guide to get the full methodology for each top-ranked vector.

Generate payload templates for authorized testing against systems the tester owns or is permitted to test. Payloads are annotated templates — each includes why it works in the specified context, what vulnerability class it tests, detection signatures that WAF/IDS products might fire, and recommended mitigations. Context-awareness is core: an XSS payload for an HTML attribute differs entirely from one for a JS template literal, and both differ from a DOM-based sink. When a WAF profile is specified, bypass variants reference known public research for that WAF product. All payloads are illustrative templates for authorized testing only.

Scan a public GitHub MCP-server repository for security issues. Clones the repo (shallow, <60s, <200 MB), runs compuute-scan v0.6.2 in static analysis mode (no code execution from the target), and returns a structured report with severity counts, a 0-100 score, and the 10 most severe findings. WHEN TO USE: - Before connecting to an unknown MCP server discovered via Anthropic Registry, Smithery, mcp.so, or a Discord recommendation. - Before installing a third-party MCP-server package into a production pipeline. - As part of an agent's pre-commit / pre-deploy due-diligence step when adding new dependencies. - As one input to a multi-source trust evaluation (combine with publisher reputation, package install count, last-update recency). WHEN NOT TO USE: - For private repos. Use the on-prem CLI instead: `npx compuute-scan ./path-to-private-repo` - For deep exploitability assessment of a specific code path. This is pattern matching, not dataflow analysis. Book a manual L2-L4 audit at https://compuute.se/audit for that depth. - For non-GitHub hosts (GitLab, Bitbucket, self-hosted). v1 supports github.com only. - For repos > 200 MB or clone time > 60s. The endpoint returns a 413 or 504 in those cases — fall back to local CLI. EXPECTED RESPONSE TIME: - Median: ~1-2 seconds for small repos (<100 files). - p99: ~10 seconds for medium repos. - Hard timeout at clone=60s, scan=120s combined. EXPECTED COST: - Free tier in MVP. Future Pro tier may charge per-scan or per-month. DATA FRESHNESS: - Scanner version is reported in response.scanner.version. - L1 rule set freshness reflects compuute-scan releases — see github.com/Compuute/compuute-scan/CHANGELOG.md for the latest CVE and threat-intel response timeline. EXAMPLES: Example 1 — scan an MCP server you're evaluating: github_url = "https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/servers" → score: 0, summary: {critical: 1, high: 94, medium: 22} → top_findings include SSRF, eval, etc. → recommendation: "AVOID — 1 critical and 94 high finding(s)..." Example 2 — scan a clean reference implementation: github_url = "https://github.com/microsoft/azure-devops-mcp" → score: 90+, summary: {critical: 0, high: 1} → recommendation: "REVIEW — 1 high finding(s)..." Example 3 — scan your own dev MCP-server before publishing: github_url = "https://github.com/yourorg/your-mcp" → audit your own surface before others install it OUTPUT FIELDS (stable schema): - repo_url (str): canonical URL of the scanned repo. - score (int): 0-100, higher safer. Coarse summary, not a precision claim. - summary (object): {critical, high, medium, low, info, files_scanned}. - recommendation (str): action guidance derived from severity counts. - findings_count (int): total raw findings (may include false positives). - top_findings (list): up to 10 most severe, each with {id, title, severity, file, line, owasp, cwe}. - l0_discovery (object): MCP transport, tool count, dependency pinning. - performance (object): clone_seconds, scan_seconds, repo_size_bytes. - scanner (object): {name, version, layers_covered}. - _disclaimer (str): MANDATORY triage disclaimer. Read it. Args: github_url: Public GitHub HTTPS URL (e.g. https://github.com/org/repo). Must be public and < 200 MB. v1 is github.com only. Returns: Structured scan result. On error, returns {"error": code, "message": ...} with HTTP-style code (invalid_url, clone_failed, scan_timeout, etc.).